We're Hosting a Regional!!!!

[Jaromir Jagr]

The 16 regional sites, with host institutions and records are as follows:

Baton Rouge, Louisiana – LSU (42-18)
Charlottesville, Virginia – Virginia (37-20)
Clemson, South Carolina – Clemson (42-18)
College Station, Texas – Texas A&M (45-14)
Columbia, South Carolina – South Carolina (42-15)
Coral Gables, Florida – Miami (FL) (45-11)
Fort Worth, Texas – TCU (42-15)
Gainesville, Florida – Florida (47-13)
Lafayette, Louisiana – UL Lafayette (41-19)
Louisville, Kentucky – Louisville (47-12)
Lubbock, Texas – Texas Tech (41-16)
Nashville, Tennessee – Vanderbilt (43-17)
Oxford, Mississippi – Ole Miss (43-17)
Raleigh, North Carolina – North Carolina State (35-20)
Starkville, Mississippi – Mississippi State (41-16)
Tallahassee, Florida – Florida State (37-20)

 

[Zbrod95]

You forgot to put the sob face

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Fairfield and Western Michigan are the two worst teams in the field.

We'll get a good idea of how bad this committee is based on where they're sent.

 

[CTCANE]

Fairfield and Western Michigan are the two worst teams in the field.

We'll get a good idea of how bad this committee is based on where they're sent.

I think either Stetson or Bethune Cookman will be the 4 seed in our bracket. We will probably have to beat a SEC team in the Super Regionals if we win the regional.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

There is a very limited pool of regionals we could possibly go up against. The Texas/ Louisiana regionals will be grouped together. We can't go against other national seeds or other ACC teams. That leaves us with Vandy, South Carolina, or the Mississippi that doesn't get a national seed.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

I think either Stetson or Bethune Cookman will be the 4 seed in our bracket. We will probably have to beat a SEC team in the Super Regionals if we win the regional.

If we are # 1 or # 2 overall and we don't get Fairfield or Western Michigan it's more proof of how broken the selection process is.

It's far too regional and most of the time there's no sense to any of the pairings,