UM Board of Trustee's Have Just Stepped Up To The Plate

stat1124

Hurricane FlashForwards
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Messages
1,762
University of Miami: Self-imposed sanctions have strengthened our mission


On behalf of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami, I wish to reaffirm President Donna Shalala’s expression of regret and our acceptance of responsibility for violations of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules by current and former student-athletes, coaches and staff. Our institution can — and must — do a better job of ensuring compliance to NCAA and ACC rules, and that effort of strengthening our policies and procedures is well underway.

Unfortunately, over the last 2 1/2 years, the university has lived under the glaring light of a protracted and sensationalized NCAA investigation, which often overshadows the wonderful accomplishment of our current student-athletes, most recently the dramatic rise of our men’s basketball team to unprecedented heights.

Despite the often unwieldy investigation, the University of Miami, at President Shalala’s and the Board of Trustees’ insistence, has held itself to the highest standards in its model cooperation with the NCAA. Our administrators, staff, and student-athletes have been forthcoming with information and transparency in their efforts to address any concerns. What has been lost in recent months is the fact that it was the university that first advised the NCAA of potential violations back in 2010.

The university has self-imposed unprecedented sanctions, including the football program’s two-year bowl ban and forfeiture of a hard-earned conference championship game. Student-athletes found to have violated NCAA rules were withheld from competition, and they repaid any inappropriate benefits that they had received.

Regardless of the many troubling aspects of the NCAA’s conduct, we must keep our focus on our core mission as an institution of higher learning: Fostering our students’ intellectual and, in the case of our athletes, physical development. We must never lose sight of our role in helping them become effective and ethical leaders, both on and off the playing field. I believe our approach and conduct during this lengthy investigation has done just that.

While I believe that the University of Miami will emerge stronger and more committed than ever to the letter and the spirit in which the NCAA’s rules of conduct were established, the trustees respectfully, but firmly, add our own voice to President Shalala’s in asking that no further sanctions be imposed on the dedicated, talented, and outstanding men and women who proudly represent the Miami Hurricanes.

Leonard Abess, chair, University of Miami Board of Trustees

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/02/21/3246573/university-of-miami-self-imposed.html#storylink=cpy
 
Advertisement
A little less sharp but understandably so. Still pointed, they stand behind the President. We've suffered enough.

... but firmly...

That says a lot. It's another warning that this will not go quietly should they choose to continue this path.
 
[video=youtube;8BIdy2fQK5I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8BIdy2fQK5I[/video]
 
We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. We are fighting for our right to move on and proceed with no more sanctions. And should we win the day, this day will go down in history as the day the Canes Family declared in one voice: "We will not go quietly into the night!" We will not vanish without a fight! We're going to live on! We're going to survive! Today we celebrate our Day of Freedom from such an outlandish notice of allegations! (lots of help from Independence Day Movie)
 
basically the NCAA just got a noite

you give us any more sanctions.. we will appeal and take it to the courts where you know you will lose.

We skate but the scars remain. Go Canes!
 
Advertisement
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

For 2 1/2 yrs Miami has kept quiet, and fully cooperated. It's obvious that the NCAA ultimate motive was , and continues to be the destruction of Miami. Bring Miami down, even if it means breaking our own rules!
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

If you surround the enemy, leave an outlet; do not press an enemy that is cornered.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

I don't think the statement is designed to tell the NCAA that UM intends to pursue this matter in court and, certainly, is not about taunting.

I think the benefit is to press the position again and keep the position out in public. It is another news report addding to the drumbeat. It makes clear to the public that the BOT is standing with President Shalala. There's not a divided house behind her. It also avoid the media asking questions of BOT members and getting mixed or unclear responses. It allows the BOT to speak with one voice at one time.

The statement is dignified, respectful and well played.
 
Advertisement
meet our new mascot
273.jpg
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

If you surround the enemy, leave an outlet; do not press an enemy that is cornered.

The NCAA hardly is cornered. UM went behind closed doors and enforcement issued the NOA and went LOIC. It picked the fight.

UM gave the NCAA a way out and the NCAA didn't want it. Eventually, you have to take the next step. Keeping favorable public opinion will help give the infractions folks cover for their decision. You set the dialog now.

In that regard, that statement isn't a beat down. It is a push in the right direction.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

I don't think the statement is designed to tell the NCAA that UM intends to pursue this matter in court and, certainly, is not about taunting.

I think the benefit is to press the position again and keep the position out in public. It is another news report addding to the drumbeat. It makes clear to the public that the BOT is standing with President Shalala. There's not a divided house behind her. It also avoid the media asking questions of BOT members and getting mixed or unclear responses. It allows the BOT to speak with one voice at one time.

The statement is dignified, respectful and well played.

Assuming it's well played sounds presumptuous to me. There are consequences to putting yourself on record like that. Adding to the drumbeat, as you put it, can cause the other side to dig in, as I'd mentioned. And it can make it harder for you to compromise as well, if need be. Whether it's 'well played' is a function of what they think it will accomplish, and whether it accomplishes those things, which isn't knowable at this time. It might make people feel good to read it, but that doesn't make it well played. And in fact, it's quite rare to see people in SD and the BOT's positions go on record as they have in the face of a pending investigation like this. There's a reason for that.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

Dig in?

The head of the board is a Fed Reserve guy.....kind of a big deal. This isn't about NCAA rules or the feelings of the enforcement division. It's about power and politics. If DS can line up enough big hitters to create the harm of real political consequences...we win.

If DWS gets involved that's huge. She is the DNC chair.

The organizations feelings are largely irrelevant. What's relevant is power and PR.

Where the PR game goes....everything else will follow.
 
Advertisement
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

I don't think the statement is designed to tell the NCAA that UM intends to pursue this matter in court and, certainly, is not about taunting.

I think the benefit is to press the position again and keep the position out in public. It is another news report addding to the drumbeat. It makes clear to the public that the BOT is standing with President Shalala. There's not a divided house behind her. It also avoid the media asking questions of BOT members and getting mixed or unclear responses. It allows the BOT to speak with one voice at one time.

The statement is dignified, respectful and well played.

Assuming it's well played sounds presumptuous to me. There are consequences to putting yourself on record like that. Adding to the drumbeat, as you put it, can cause the other side to dig in, as I'd mentioned. And it can make it harder for you to compromise as well, if need be. Whether it's 'well played' is a function of what they think it will accomplish, and whether it accomplishes those things, which isn't knowable at this time. It might make people feel good to read it, but that doesn't make it well played. And in fact, it's quite rare to see people in SD and the BOT's positions go on record as they have in the face of a pending investigation like this. There's a reason for that.

What signs are there that Shalala's comments and those of the BOT have not worked well thus far, or will have an ill effect down the line for our case? You've been quite critical of this approach, so what gives you the impression that these public statements have been missteps?

In terms of compromise, such statements offer a baseline for negotiations. That it's quite rare to see people go on record in such ways means little, if anything...the fact is that the investigation thus far has been so extraordinary and singular that there is no precedent for how to deal with it.
 
I see it as having the sole purpose of showing that the BOT stands firmly behind Donna. Nothing more and nothing less. I've read recent articles asking what did she know and when did she know it. There should be no confusion at this time - Emmert is the one who needs to answer such queries.

The NCAA & talking heads should know that she is not going rogue or trying to save her own job but rather that she has the full support of her institution behind her. Period. End of story.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

If you surround the enemy, leave an outlet; do not press an enemy that is cornered.

The outlet is doing the right thing and calling a halt to this f#ckery.
 
Advertisement
How can u say no to that? Oh, the ncaa decides.


Ncaa is alpha unless they ***** out.


Miami is alpha regardless of outcome.
 
I see it as having the sole purpose of showing that the BOT stands firmly behind Donna. Nothing more and nothing less. I've read recent articles asking what did she know and when did she know it. There should be no confusion at this time - Emmert is the one who needs to answer such queries.

The NCAA & talking heads should know that she is not going rogue or trying to save her own job but rather that she has the full support of her institution behind her. Period. End of story.

Regarding the bolded portions above, we tracked down every active player who was mentioned in that con artist's story and made them own up to what they did or didn't do, then made them pay for it with suspensions and restitution. In the case of Dequan, we allowed him to be wrongly accused. We then self-imposed sanctions based on what we understood was appropriate.

What the **** has Emmert done that is close to commensurate with that. Threw someone under the bus.

So I agree with C4TC, this is nothing more than strongly reiterating our position.
 
I don't see the benefit of this statement. If you want to let the NCAA know you intend to pursue this to the courts, there are quieter ways to do so. This posturing risks causing the NCAA to dig in, IMO. Never good to taunt a cornered animal, which is what the NCAA is at this point.

Dig in?

The head of the board is a Fed Reserve guy.....kind of a big deal. This isn't about NCAA rules or the feelings of the enforcement division. It's about power and politics. If DS can line up enough big hitters to create the harm of real political consequences...we win.

If DWS gets involved that's huge. She is the DNC chair.

The organizations feelings are largely irrelevant. What's relevant is power and PR.

Where the PR game goes....everything else will follow.

Yup!!
That letter is from the billionaire Leonard Abess who has some serious clout in Florida and DC..

"Hope is found in unlikely places, I think Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company,
took a $60 million bonus and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him."
He didn't tell anyone," the president told to the nation, "but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said,
"I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn't feel right getting the money myself."

-President Obama first speech to Congress
 
Advertisement
Back
Top