UF and FSU Defensive Schemes

UMFarArcher

All-ACC
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
17,154
I don't care what you say about talent, these guys are laying their ears back and are very aggressive. Talent only enhances an aggressive defense.

You can take five stars three-deep, and if the DB's are playing ten and fifteen yards off the receivers - you're going to be eaten alive. Look at all the man coverage right at the line. It throws off the timing of even the most experienced and talented receivers.

The linemen are going for the gaps, not standing in place and getting moved at will.

The LB's are aggressive, attacking, and don't lay back giving up ten yard cushions.

Florida graduated or lost to the NFL their previous DL group, but against FSU, we're seeing them giving Jameis a hard time.

Scheme matters. You're either passive or attacking, and all year, we've been passive. Attacking defenses have given our offense problems - some we could overcome, but overall, our offense practices against our defense - and guess what? We have problems on offense!

You are aggressive, you cover a ton of weaknesses - thus our close calls against **** poor teams, because we are passive. A passive defense magnifies somewhat lesser talent, and just looks like a amateur hour out there.

There are aggressive high school teams that would give Miami a hard time.

Due entirely to scheme. Or, should I say, a lack thereof.
 
Advertisement
I am anti Dorito and the scheme, but dont kid yourselves, the have the horses to do that. We do that and we probably give up 700 yds.......
 
I am anti Dorito and the scheme, but dont kid yourselves, the have the horses to do that. We do that and we probably give up 700 yds.......

Guess we'll never know, huh?

I rather give up 500 yards while being aggressive and fighting for a win, than absorbing whatever punishing offense the opponents decide to dish out.
 
I am anti Dorito and the scheme, but dont kid yourselves, the have the horses to do that. We do that and we probably give up 700 yds.......

Please. We give up 500 yds a game... simplifying things and attacking would benefit this whack defense.
 
Advertisement
Why did this need a new thread?

Seriously. Stop being a ******* porster with the multiple threads. You could have easily added any scheme related points you are trying to make to one of the other threads.

It's getting out of hand.

There are talent and scheme arguments to be made. But they don't need multiple threads each.
 
they are way deeper with better athletes. ty, kacy, aj and armbrister dont play on these defenses.
 
Advertisement
I'm glad I logged on. Enlightening. Some high school teams would definitely challenge UM. No doubt.
 
Why did this need a new thread?

Seriously. Stop being a ****ing porster with the multiple threads. You could have easily added any scheme related points you are trying to make to one of the other threads.

It's getting out of hand.

There are talent and scheme arguments to be made. But they don't need multiple threads each.

Ever do anything but whine?

You want some vagisil for that? If I were you, I'd buy in bulk.

And by the way, Mark, your defensive scheme still sucks balls.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top