Larry
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 13,571
I'm a huge proponent of the importance of the tight end in football, and never moreso in college football.
This year, there were 11 BCS schools that had wide receivers in the Top 200 nationally in receiving and had that TE as one of their top two leading receivers...they went 97-33 this year and all are going bowling.
Expand that to all of FBS and allow to cover to the Top 250 receivers, and you will find only two teams with a top targeted tight end failed to go to a bowl game this year (Eastern Michigan and UMass) out of the 20+ total teams that used their TE to this extent.
Tight End = Important.
This year, there were 11 BCS schools that had wide receivers in the Top 200 nationally in receiving and had that TE as one of their top two leading receivers...they went 97-33 this year and all are going bowling.
Expand that to all of FBS and allow to cover to the Top 250 receivers, and you will find only two teams with a top targeted tight end failed to go to a bowl game this year (Eastern Michigan and UMass) out of the 20+ total teams that used their TE to this extent.
Tight End = Important.