Da Jumbo Mutombo
Senior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Messages
- 3,241
Here was the original list I believePSA to everybody: Belk was not on the original list.
Last edited by a moderator:
Here was the original list I believePSA to everybody: Belk was not on the original list.
And Hurtt was eliminated. Flip a coin. PS it isn’t that hard to figure out if you’ve been following who’s been interviewed and who’s hired.Hurtt, Schuman, Partridge, and Mason were all names given on the first post
I went back 75 pages and I saw a Ric Flair meme. Very underwhelming hire.Go scroll back about 75 pages. Really isn’t that ******* hard.
@RVACane this guy is gonna make me get the bat.
Eh. I'm not into badgering a poster for more information but this whole thread started with a list of names that were being considered. So why would an OC name that would make football people happy be off-limits to say? It is just a possibility anyway. Whats the difference between listing Brady, Briles back then and the new guy?If you weren’t retarded you would’ve picked up on what he already said. It isn’t his fault you can barely function.
It’s on page 416I went back 75 pages and I saw a Ric Flair meme. Very underwhelming hire.
Partridge was just promoted at ole miss so he may be unlikely. Seems like hurtt is out based on reports from today. Leaves schumann and mason.Hurtt, Schuman, Partridge, and Mason were all names given on the first post
Then go back farther until you disappear.I went back 75 pages and I saw a Ric Flair meme. Very underwhelming hire.
Because it’s already been said. We spent days arguing about it.Eh. I'm not into badgering a poster for more information but this whole thread started with a list of names that were being considered. So why would an OC name that would make football people happy be off-limits to say? It is just a possibility anyway. Whats the difference between listing Brady, Briles back then and the new guy?
okayThen go back farther until you disappear.
Cry me a river.
Who's the OC/DC?
So if it has already been said, and days were spent arguing about it and that poster missed it....what is the harm in saying it again?Because it’s already been said. We spent days arguing about it.
because they don't know for sure.Eh. I'm not into badgering a poster for more information but this whole thread started with a list of names that were being considered. So why would an OC name that would make football people happy be off-limits to say? It is just a possibility anyway. Whats the difference between listing Brady, Briles back then and the new guy?
Because he didn’t miss it and he’s trying to **** off the only guy that gets true info over and over again.So if it has already been said and days were spent arguing about it and that poster missed it whats the harm in saying it again?
No he’s not. He’s out of the thread for not playing nice and badgering the **** out of OP. None of us appreciate it.Go scroll back about 75 pages. Really isn’t that ******* hard.
@RVACane this guy is gonna make me get the bat.
Until today I’ve been saying “ I didn’t know and for obvious reasons“ .I also said before this weekend if anyone says they know who‘s been hired as coordinators they’re lying. So by my math I can’t be right or wrong . I’ve been the one guy not giggling acting like I’m in on the big oc / dc secret. When there wasn’t one lol. I could’ve played it off very easily if I wanted the attention like some say.Yeah, you gave enough names that you couldn't possibly be wrong.
What if im both lolA “possible” name I’ve heard at oc would make the football guys happy but the name whores would be limp.
Wait…pruitt??It’s on page 416