- Joined
- Oct 21, 2011
- Messages
- 15,601
I responded to your post re: Knighton's production under Lashlee vs Gattis. Gattis failed to do what Lashlee was able to do. Your singular stat proves a singular thing you're using as proof of so much more. That's the beginning and the end of the argument, or at least what I responded to.You're not staying on topic at all. You're just ranting into the ether and somehow turning a Knighton thread into a Gattis thread.
His numbers under Lashlee were bad. Why we are even debating this seems like a waste of time. In less snaps, Knighton performed better on a per play basis, this is factual and supported by evidence. Why didn't he play more? Well, that was all on him. Lost his job. Fumbled at a horrific rate. Wasn't putting in the work.
That's the end of the discussion...you can create some Lashlee fan fiction to spin as you see fit, but the numbers are the numbers on Knighton. Its been discussed ad nauseam. It, as well as Gattis discussion, is old at this point.
My original post stated Knighton should go somewhere else because he didn't perform that well under Lashlee. Maybe he'll perform better for Lashlee in the G5, I guess.