Props to the Board

[UMFarArcher]

wait he was banned for this? i thought it was an informative post.

america continues to become pussified

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

If you want some really good advice, just ask me.

Glad to help.

 

[SayWhat]

wait he was banned for this? i thought it was an informative post.

america continues to become pussified

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

 

[Tetragrammaton Cane]

wait he was banned for this? i thought it was an informative post.

america continues to become pussified

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Who gives a ****....if you don't like it then don't visit the site. Why do some of you pvssy's feel like you are owed some kind of an explanation for everything that takes place on this FREE board. Go find your safe space and have some hot cocoa.

That was a real punk think to say, Mike. I’m hoping you’re better than that; I believe you’re better than that, but I’ve been wrong before. Is that who you really are? Another ANONYMOUS forum name caller? That’s you? For real? You proud of that?

 

[IndayArtHauz]

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

Appreciate it.

I don't know who you're talking about, but in a sense it doesn't matter. I'm not sure what isn't coming through about shake&bake, but I gave him each of his infractions over the course of a week or so. They're all for starting trolling threads. I know you guys don't see it right away, but trust me there's a consistent pattern almost all trolls follow (start an account, start a very high concentration of new threads that usually are disguised slights or leading questions, act shocked people don't see their sincerity). I've modded at multiple sites over the last 10 years and it's insanely consistent on that front. They also never respond to warnings or change their behavior.

It's not your job to sniff this stuff out, but there's a world of difference between "bad posters" and total trolls. It's not my website, and I'm not here to run it how I want, but the trolls are enough of a drain that it's worth banning them.

He'll be back in a week. Let's see if I'm wrong.

 

[RVACane]

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

Appreciate it.

I don't know who you're talking about, but in a sense it doesn't matter. I'm not sure what isn't coming through about shake&bake, but I gave him each of his infractions over the course of a week or so. They're all for starting trolling threads. I know you guys don't see it right away, but trust me there's a consistent pattern almost all trolls follow (start an account, start a very high concentration of new threads that usually are disguised slights or leading questions, act shocked people don't see their sincerity). I've modded at multiple sites over the last 10 years and it's insanely consistent on that front. They also never respond to warnings or change their behavior.

It's not your job to sniff this stuff out, but there's a world of difference between "bad posters" and total trolls. It's not my website, and I'm not here to run it how I want, but the trolls are enough of a drain that it's worth banning them.

He'll be back in a week. Let's see if I'm wrong.

#IndayKillsTrollsDead

 

[Hurricanemike32]

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Who gives a ****....if you don't like it then don't visit the site. Why do some of you pvssy's feel like you are owed some kind of an explanation for everything that takes place on this FREE board. Go find your safe space and have some hot cocoa.

That was a real punk think to say, Mike. I’m hoping you’re better than that; I believe you’re better than that, but I’ve been wrong before. Is that who you really are? Another ANONYMOUS forum name caller? That’s you? For real? You proud of that?

LOL!!! Very proud of it. Don’t tell anyone though....I am trying to stay anonymous. For real.

 

[SayWhat]

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

Appreciate it.

I don't know who you're talking about, but in a sense it doesn't matter. I'm not sure what isn't coming through about shake&bake, but I gave him each of his infractions over the course of a week or so. They're all for starting trolling threads. I know you guys don't see it right away, but trust me there's a consistent pattern almost all trolls follow (start an account, start a very high concentration of new threads that usually are disguised slights or leading questions, act shocked people don't see their sincerity). I've modded at multiple sites over the last 10 years and it's insanely consistent on that front. They also never respond to warnings or change their behavior.

It's not your job to sniff this stuff out, but there's a world of difference between "bad posters" and total trolls. It's not my website, and I'm not here to run it how I want, but the trolls are enough of a drain that it's worth banning them.

He'll be back in a week. Let's see if I'm wrong.

Fair enough and I appreciate the reply and thoroghness of it.

Anyhow the Frenk thread was pretty fanned disgusting in part. Unfortunately you missed it.

 

[Tetragrammaton Cane]

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Who gives a ****....if you don't like it then don't visit the site. Why do some of you pvssy's feel like you are owed some kind of an explanation for everything that takes place on this FREE board. Go find your safe space and have some hot cocoa.

That was a real punk think to say, Mike. I’m hoping you’re better than that; I believe you’re better than that, but I’ve been wrong before. Is that who you really are? Another ANONYMOUS forum name caller? That’s you? For real? You proud of that?

LOL!!! Very proud of it. Don’t tell anyone though....I am trying to stay anonymous. For real.

Punks tend to be proud of that type of thing. As I said, thought you were better.

 

[Hurricanemike32]

Punk? What are you, another one of those anonymous forum name caller? Please tell me that you’re better than that. Is that really who you are? Are you proud of that?

 

[IndayArtHauz]

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

Appreciate it.

I don't know who you're talking about, but in a sense it doesn't matter. I'm not sure what isn't coming through about shake&bake, but I gave him each of his infractions over the course of a week or so. They're all for starting trolling threads. I know you guys don't see it right away, but trust me there's a consistent pattern almost all trolls follow (start an account, start a very high concentration of new threads that usually are disguised slights or leading questions, act shocked people don't see their sincerity). I've modded at multiple sites over the last 10 years and it's insanely consistent on that front. They also never respond to warnings or change their behavior.

It's not your job to sniff this stuff out, but there's a world of difference between "bad posters" and total trolls. It's not my website, and I'm not here to run it how I want, but the trolls are enough of a drain that it's worth banning them.

He'll be back in a week. Let's see if I'm wrong.

Fair enough and I appreciate the reply and thoroghness of it.

Anyhow the Frenk thread was pretty fanned disgusting in part. Unfortunately you missed it.

I did, unfortunately. Sounds pretty bad. Next time hopefully I'll be around.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

wait he was banned for this? i thought it was an informative post.

america continues to become pussified

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

This was a skilled band -- don't let anyone tell you otherwise. His troll game is less "in your face" than the usual lizard trash, but this was not an isolated incident by any means.

 

[Gatorhater]

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

ok, but i still dont see anything from recently that would deserve a ban unless it was deleted?

I’m with you on this Derek. Tons of other posts that should be deemed objectionable based upon the board rules as well as individual moderator predilection.

Thanks for the advice guys.

You're one of the good ones, but Derek is right on this one, providing something wasn't erased that the dude posted.

A perfect example of people saying stuff and not getting banned was when our president was hired. People were calling him a soccer loving beaner and one of them still posts here having 10's of thousands of posts attacking posters non-stop. Consequently he also neglected to post in the congrats thread for him a few weeks ago.

Can we talk about him now? I was not impressed at first but firing al went a long way and then hiring mark but the duke thing sold me. He actually defended our boys. I hav never seen that from any of the idiots before him. Now the TO chain thing is classic. I think he is enjoying thumping all those gringo stuffed shirts at the other universities. I like him.

 

[Paskudnyak]

wait he was banned for this? i thought it was an informative post.

america continues to become pussified

Go ahead and review his post history, thanks. No one gets Band for starting a thread. Cmon man. It's also a temp band.

 

[Paskudnyak]

 

[Peter Ariz]

free trip

 

[Cajuncane]

INDAY has him one **** of a BAND and is willing to make you first chair if you stray too far..