@ Pitt (No Angel, Sheldon likely out)

Advertisement
4 in a row or we don't dance

Burnett coming out party starts tonight and lasts a little longer than an entire month
 
Michelle Kaufman @kaufsports · 32m 32 minutes ago

Twitter reports that Sheldon McClellan (groin) out untrue. Expected to start tonight v Pitt. @CanesHoops @HeraldSports @MiamiHerald #UM
 
4 in a row or we don't dance

Burnett coming out party starts tonight and lasts a little longer than an entire month

it depends if Burnett can avoid palming, traveling, or some other non shooting related issue for more than 5 minutes.
 
So did everyone give up? We just beat Pitt on the road, 67-63. Reed had a monster game. Canes now 19-10, 9-8. Beat VT this weekend and we're looking good.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
So did everyone give up? We just beat Pitt on the road, 67-63. Reed had a monster game. Canes now 19-10, 9-8. Beat VT this weekend and we're looking good.

Not sure if people gave up ---- my guess is either people didn't care that much to begin with, some are trolling, some are tired of the first two categories.

Big win nonetheless - on the road and against another "bubble" team.
 
Our RPI is really holding us back. I just hope this committee takes a good look at this team. They want to select teams that can be highly competitive in the tournament. There's no question we can compete and even beat good teams in this tournament. Great win by this team. Watching Sheldon close out the game makes me think we could have stolen a few more close games if Sheldon was our go to instead of Angel.
 
Advertisement
RPI tells us that 6th place in the A-10 is worth an RPI of #17 but 6th place in ACC with #2,3, 8 teams in nation and 5 top 20 teams we're #65 RPI. And before u list OOC take a look they beat NIowa/Oregon. Makes no sense.
 
Advertisement
Hopefully they don't just use RPI without looking deeper

Its just part of a resume but just feels like people have become so reliant of RPI to judge a teams worth. Every conversation i get in bashing other conferences main arguement they make is RPI. But when i mention actual wins and losses there stumped. Bracketology has brainwashed people into using RPI as the main barometer.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top