forums

Per Conference / Division Blue Chip numbers

brcane1

brcane1

Sophomore
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
2,963
I counted these totals for the various conferences and divisions from the 247 rankings. Miami and Southern Cal were the only teams to outpace the rest of their divisions combined. I'm counting any 4* or better as blue chip here.

Blue Chips / Per Team

SEC West 51 / 7.3

B1G East 46 / 6.6

SEC East 42 / 6.0

Entire B12 42 / 4.2

PAC 12 North 26 / 4.3

ACC Coastal 25 / 3.6

ACC Atlantic 25 / 3.6

PAC 12 South 19 / 3.2

B1G West 10 / 1.4

By Conference

SEC 93 / 6.6

B1G 56 / 4.0

ACC 50 / 3.6

PAC 12 45 / 3.8

B12 42 / 4.2

The G5

CUSA 2

MAC 1

MW 1

AAC 0
 

Advertisement
Fact is...if we all could "pay to play", and no risk of fallout ( like the sec).. Those numbers would be a lot different.

That's what I was told....by a friend!!
 
ajkreider said:
Stars don't matter, though. Read that right on this here site.
Click to expand...
They matter, but it's not the be all end all, it simply determines your potential as a team. See Golden and Butch Jones for what else matters

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
 
brcane1 said:
I counted these totals for the various conferences and divisions from the 247 rankings. Miami and Southern Cal were the only teams to outpace the rest of their divisions combined. I'm counting any 4* or better as blue chip here.

Blue Chips / Per Team

SEC West 51 / 7.3

B1G East 46 / 6.6

SEC East 42 / 6.0

Entire B12 42 / 4.2

PAC 12 North 26 / 4.3

ACC Coastal 25 / 3.6

ACC Atlantic 25 / 3.6

PAC 12 South 19 / 3.2

B1G West 10 / 1.4

By Conference

SEC 93 / 6.6

B1G 56 / 4.0

ACC 50 / 3.6

PAC 12 45 / 3.8

B12 42 / 4.2

The G5

CUSA 2

MAC 1

MW 1

AAC 0
Click to expand...

So if you take Miami and Clemson out of it the Coastal and Atlantic, it would Big West on each side ACC. Miami and Clemson will continue to be the top tier of the ACC.
 
Advertisement
We lost Samuels to a coach that's been on the job for two weeks ... and there is no DC. **** it ...!
 
Advertisement
Back
Top