I think Collins is actually moving GT in the right direction. He is a good coach and recruiter. He has a tall task ahead of him but he is doing a nice job so far. Recruiting Georgia is tough against the SEC but he is on a branding mission.
How do all of these guys that left impact their ICs and numbers they can take this year?
I agree on GaTech, plus you keep hearing that name in the Top 10 lists of a lot of recruits. I think that LCE or Cribby mentioned that they had an ace recruiter on staff now.
As for F$U, they may be OK on the "overall" number of ICs for this upcoming year (not sure how many kids Norvell took in Year 1 including transfers), but then you have to break it down by two basic issues.
First, on overall numbers, when you have RECENT recruits leaving, that is usually a number that is harder to plug. The 25 ICs usually can take care of the seniors, the early NFL applicants, and the "normal" attrition of guys leaving for lack of PT or injuries. But when you add in a lot of kids who COULD be playing but for a culture clash with the coach, it will make it hard for F$U to sniff 85 for a few years.
Second, you also have to analyze what it means (to the overall numbers) to use 5, 6, or 7 of your 25 ICs on transfer kids who only have 1 or 2 years to play. Sure, you can address your "first-string" deficiencies, but then you put enormous pressure on your HS recruits to turn into rapid contributors. You need a VERY high hit rate, you need kids who can probably play more quickly than not, and you need to be able find culture fits right off the bat. It's a tall order, and very few coaches (such as Butch in the late 90s) can really stick that landing.
The only thing that MIGHT save F$U and help them to rebuild more quickly is if the NCAA allowed you to replace ICs for TRANSFERS-OUT with transfers-in. Post-Covid, that is one "reform" that I could see taking hold. I think you will see a LOT of transfers after this season, as the "free year" and other issues cause a lot of kids to rethink where they should be. If this issue hits 70% of the schools (obviously not the Alabamas and Clemsons of the world), there will be enormous pressure to make a change to the IC rules for transfers.