NIL Question

[ghost2]

Potentially unanswerable without knowing details, but will not having Cam's NIL money anymore give us a larger pool from which to draw this year, or is that not how it works?

 

[DC3]

Potentially unanswerable without knowing details, but will not having Cam's NIL money anymore give us a larger pool from which to draw this year, or is that not how it works?

As i understand it. Miami purposelly went overbudget for last years run. This year they are going to stricty stick to said budget especailly with Mario coming up short of expectations.

So less money to work wtih than last year.

 

[SinisterCane]

We broke

 

[Big O Cane]

Ya’ll believe what you write. Lol

 

[Ryanmilli]

There’s virtually no way we have less money this year. Maybe less money relative to some other schools. NCAA revenue sharing comes online next year, and a majority of the $20.5 million allowed will go to football. Probably $15 million. And that can be supplemented with NIL funds from the collectives.

How exactly it will all work isn’t certain and different schools may be handling it differently. There are Title IX concerns and other potential issues like whether there will be a market value restriction on NIL. I heard Cignetti talking about it on signing day and he said IU was offering players “one number” that included revenue share and NIL.

Where it seems this could eventually land, perhaps with an assist from Congress, is that revenue sharing will create a baseline salary cap (and it will increase annually per the settlement), NIL will be on top of that but it will be monitored and tethered to market value, and schools will sign kids to multi-year deals to check the portal madness to a degree. And the SEC will have to find new ways to cheat.

 

[Empirical Cane]

 

[RozayCane]

So this only affects NIL from school to athlete.. but not from collectives and business?

 

[CaneThang2020]

My question would be, how is it NAME, Image, and Likeness if my (star QB, Cam Ward) NIL generates 18% of the athletic departments revenue and said women’s lacrosse player generates 0.002%. Isn’t that illegal? If nothing else, it needs to be changed from NIL to ADSM (Athletic Dept Sharing Model) or something.

The govt is ridiculous and wrong on this one

 

[NicKane]

My question would be, how is it NAME, Image, and Likeness if my (star QB, Cam Ward) NIL generates 18% of the athletic departments revenue and said women’s lacrosse player generates 0.002%. Isn’t that illegal? If nothing else, it needs to be changed from NIL to ADSM (Athletic Dept Sharing Model) or something.

The govt is ridiculous and wrong on this one

And they will lose that in court.

 

[BS85]

So this only affects NIL from school to athlete.. but not from collectives and business?

No, it includes both

 

[RozayCane]

No, it includes both

****

 

[Tinman64]

Watching cowherd at the moment talking about beck was offered 10mil

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

No, it includes both

No, it does not. The articles makes that point clear. It only applies to payments made directly by schools.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

So this only affects NIL from school to athlete.. but not from collectives and business?

Just the schools. It's in the article.

 

[Empirical Cane]

Watching cowherd at the moment talking about beck was offered 10mil

That equals my deal here on CIS.

I have an escalator clause though, so I'll be speaking with management shortly.

 

[BS85]

No, it does not. The articles makes that point clear. It only applies to payments made directly by schools.

I read another article yesterday which said the opposite, glad that one was wrong

 

[BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati]

That equals my deal here on CIS.

I have an escalator clause though, so I'll be speaking with management shortly.

I too enjoy a good escalator: