The discussion was started because I inquired about Dt's. I said that the lack of an impact DT would result in moderate improvement. The replies where more optimistic than my assessment.
I think with the recent addition of Bond it lends to discussing it here. This is my analysis:
My "on the fence" stance is because: Unless we see a complete different 3G (losing some weight, getting more speed) we cannot expect a MAJOR pass rush form that side of the line right? Can Pierre make that big of a jump???
I looked at some stats after giving an imaginary goal. Last year's D was remarkably better then this year's even though the players had to learn a whole new system in less then a year. In 2011 our D was giving up 20.8 pts per game - compared to 30.5 in 2012. In 2011 we gave up 359 yards per game, in 2012 we gave up 486 per game. Total defense rank in 2011 - 45, in 2012 #121. In comparison to the better defenses this year: Kansas St. gave up 21 pts per game, ND gave up a crazy 10 pts per game, and Ohio St. gave up 22.8 pts per game.
Why all those numbers? cause the "goal" i mentioned earlier, in my mind, is that if our D can equate the performance of 2011, then I believe we can potentially win every game. In 2011, the 359 yards per game an 20.8 are consistent with this year's numbers...Oio state gave up 359 yards per game and also held the opponents to low 20's at 22.8. My point??? that my imaginary goal of keeping teams to the 20-22 pts per game and about 300-350 yards per game WITH THE POTENTIAL of our offense gives us an amazing chance of running away with it. Of winning a ton of games.
But all depends on the Dline. That is why I was/am so skeptical as to what our current players can do/will do based on what we have seen. I agree, Mccord looks to be a super star and Bond may allow us to quicken throws, 3rd and longs, 3 and outs, and TO's. Porter has proven to be a difference maker. But I just don't see such a huge jump. I looked at Temple's numbers on D. In 2006 they gave up 41.3 pts per game. In 2007 - 26.25. In 2008 - 23.25. Our defense is stuck in between year two and year three with their defense. Add the intangibles: more athleticism, a higher quality player. And I guess we really should see a bigger improvement with our D. Not sure we will have this kind of jump - although I am hoping for it of course - but ND in 2011 was giving up 20.7 pts per game...in 2012 they shrunk that to 10.3 !!!!!
In any case, those are my concerns and analysis. Yes there has to be improvement. Just how much I am not so sure.
I think with the recent addition of Bond it lends to discussing it here. This is my analysis:
My "on the fence" stance is because: Unless we see a complete different 3G (losing some weight, getting more speed) we cannot expect a MAJOR pass rush form that side of the line right? Can Pierre make that big of a jump???
I looked at some stats after giving an imaginary goal. Last year's D was remarkably better then this year's even though the players had to learn a whole new system in less then a year. In 2011 our D was giving up 20.8 pts per game - compared to 30.5 in 2012. In 2011 we gave up 359 yards per game, in 2012 we gave up 486 per game. Total defense rank in 2011 - 45, in 2012 #121. In comparison to the better defenses this year: Kansas St. gave up 21 pts per game, ND gave up a crazy 10 pts per game, and Ohio St. gave up 22.8 pts per game.
Why all those numbers? cause the "goal" i mentioned earlier, in my mind, is that if our D can equate the performance of 2011, then I believe we can potentially win every game. In 2011, the 359 yards per game an 20.8 are consistent with this year's numbers...Oio state gave up 359 yards per game and also held the opponents to low 20's at 22.8. My point??? that my imaginary goal of keeping teams to the 20-22 pts per game and about 300-350 yards per game WITH THE POTENTIAL of our offense gives us an amazing chance of running away with it. Of winning a ton of games.
But all depends on the Dline. That is why I was/am so skeptical as to what our current players can do/will do based on what we have seen. I agree, Mccord looks to be a super star and Bond may allow us to quicken throws, 3rd and longs, 3 and outs, and TO's. Porter has proven to be a difference maker. But I just don't see such a huge jump. I looked at Temple's numbers on D. In 2006 they gave up 41.3 pts per game. In 2007 - 26.25. In 2008 - 23.25. Our defense is stuck in between year two and year three with their defense. Add the intangibles: more athleticism, a higher quality player. And I guess we really should see a bigger improvement with our D. Not sure we will have this kind of jump - although I am hoping for it of course - but ND in 2011 was giving up 20.7 pts per game...in 2012 they shrunk that to 10.3 !!!!!
In any case, those are my concerns and analysis. Yes there has to be improvement. Just how much I am not so sure.