@Rellyrell, what's the word here?
That being the case in your opinion did we get the better of the two landing Riley?Word is don’t pay attention to this recruitment & carry on. Pretty sure he’s #1 on Bama’s board
As of now we're in his 5(most likely 3)So have we made his top 7.5?
That being the case in your opinion did we get the better of the two landing Riley?
Been wondering if we would see this as we’ve seen more from CWH at DB
Not saying he isn’t more than capable at RB but with our struggles at DB was interested to see if we would go for more RBs
The prototypical NFL back is 5'11" 215-220. Frazier is almost already there and will get there without even trying. He's who you go after. CJ & CWH don't have the frames or builds to approach these measurables. They're not RBs... they're weapons you like to have to deploy in certain situations. I have no problem making and taking exceptions, but if you make a habit of it, then it's not an exception anymore and you're relying on body types not suited to the task.We should 100% go after Frazier.
I've been saying CJ & CWH should be considered more as ATH's than RB's since they're built more like a WR/DB.
I want both to start at RB and see what it looks like - but it shouldn't be surprising if they didn't end up at RB.
We have done this before without NIL budget (Chaney/rooster etc)…should be easier with NIL budgetI can’t imagine that our NIL budget would account for 3 RB’s, or even 2 RB’s like Riley and Frazier, assuming CWH moves to another position.
I‘m not saying its impossible but other schools will put more on the table, especially considering our needs on D-line.
Sorry to be a bummer and I hope I am wrong.