nyibis
Freshman
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 380
Watching the talk shows on ESPN and Fox this morning and it seems the talking heads, for the most part, think UM got away with gross improprieties with barely a slap on the wrist.
Most fail to mention the self imposed bowl bans, and when they do they imply it was a clever strategy to impose bans on the past insignificant bowl invitations in hopes of securing more important bowl invitations after the completion of the investigation.
There were some that understood the cost of a 3 year investigation and the effects it had on recruiting and the psyche of the student athletes. These seem to be the minority.
The conversations revolved around the incompetence of the NCAA and their inability to control the high profile powerhouse college programs, of which apparently UM is included, and how these schools can get away with any improprieties.
There was some talk about USC's penalties that seemed to be much harsher compared to UM's penalties.
My perception was that they were not familiar with the facts of the investigation or specific charges and they assumed that there were large amounts of money or gifts involved and that UM was aware of these gifts and was somehow complicit.
What do we have to do to change this perception with the media and the public?
I don't like UM being viewed as cheaters and bullies.
I know some of us enjoy the us against the world mentality but really I would rather be envied and respected as a great place to get an education and a haven of superior amateur sports.
I am interested on hearing how others feel about this as a PR issue.
GO CANES!!!! BEAT WAKE!!!!!
Most fail to mention the self imposed bowl bans, and when they do they imply it was a clever strategy to impose bans on the past insignificant bowl invitations in hopes of securing more important bowl invitations after the completion of the investigation.
There were some that understood the cost of a 3 year investigation and the effects it had on recruiting and the psyche of the student athletes. These seem to be the minority.
The conversations revolved around the incompetence of the NCAA and their inability to control the high profile powerhouse college programs, of which apparently UM is included, and how these schools can get away with any improprieties.
There was some talk about USC's penalties that seemed to be much harsher compared to UM's penalties.
My perception was that they were not familiar with the facts of the investigation or specific charges and they assumed that there were large amounts of money or gifts involved and that UM was aware of these gifts and was somehow complicit.
What do we have to do to change this perception with the media and the public?
I don't like UM being viewed as cheaters and bullies.
I know some of us enjoy the us against the world mentality but really I would rather be envied and respected as a great place to get an education and a haven of superior amateur sports.
I am interested on hearing how others feel about this as a PR issue.
GO CANES!!!! BEAT WAKE!!!!!