Clarification: there is no new NCAA ruling- there is a district court injunction that essentially prohibits the NCAA from preventing 1 player from playing next year because his years in jr. college shouldn't count against his 4 years of eligibility. It will almost certainly be appealed and I didn't see any language in the opinion stating that a nationwide injunction was ordered. I will be a little surprised if the Court of Appeal doesn't look at this differently than the District Court did.
But, if another player were to seek the same relief as Pavia did, I have no doubt that somewhere a judge will issue the same injunction. Whether any of these rulings hold up on appeal is another issue.