getcaned
Sophomore
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 747
Im sure you try to keep the former players happy by taking them in as an appreciation for service in years gone by. How many of these legacies have really had an impact vs the ones that have been complete Jags and only got on the team due to them having the right daddy?
What is the risk factor in taking these players and hoping they can bring it like dad?
See irvin's son... seems legit as of now. but i realy cant think of a legacy that has stood out.
No offense to Zo but his son doesn't deserve to see the field. he claimed when he was our back up QB his poor play was because he was only a defensive secondary player..... well that isn't showing true either. every time i see a play run to his side of the field i cringe and start thinking why is he even on the field.
What is the risk factor in taking these players and hoping they can bring it like dad?
See irvin's son... seems legit as of now. but i realy cant think of a legacy that has stood out.
No offense to Zo but his son doesn't deserve to see the field. he claimed when he was our back up QB his poor play was because he was only a defensive secondary player..... well that isn't showing true either. every time i see a play run to his side of the field i cringe and start thinking why is he even on the field.
Last edited: