Laugh at OSU thread

[Silverball]

They’re still complaining about the officials.

They got hosed, but it’s still funny to laugh at them.

 

[Bird4um]

F em

 

[nystateofmind]

Haha.

 

[Eric The Midget]

It's funny....... but we been complaining for 17 years and counting...... ****em

 

[CorniceCane]

I can think of a worse hose job in a bigger game called against UM...and ironically, that game was against OSU!

 

[canecane232323]

They didn't get hosed. They lost. The calls were correct

 

[TheEye]

You know what would be fitting? That this is their last playoff game ever.

 

[Silverball]

They didn't get hosed. They lost. The calls were correct

No, they weren’t.

The calls were terrible, but they deserved it.

 

[ddann]

They didn't get hosed. They lost. The calls were correct

^This needs to be repeated for those that didn’t get it the first time.

I don’t care how much Herbie whined during the broadcast, the plays were reviewed and the right calls were made.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

Saying O$U "got hosed" suggests they deserve better... which is verifiably false.

 

[Silverball]

Saying O$U "got hosed" suggests they deserve better... which is verifiably false.

Yeah, you’re probably right.

 

[S.CarolinaCane]

They’re still complaining about the officials.

They got hosed, but it’s still funny to laugh at them.

You're a joke?
How are you not banned?

Nevertheless, I get it....You know a guy, who knows a guy, who put you on. Regardless, it's still garbage.

 

[RVACane]

 

[Fawk_U Haters]

No, they weren’t.

The calls were terrible, but they deserved it.

1 was questionable (the fumble) the rest were spot on. They’re crying like ******* because they blew that game. I want to hear all the Ryan day is sa gawd crowd. He’s a corch, he was just gifted a stacked roster

 

[dk72]

^This needs to be repeated for those that didn’t get it the first time.

I don’t care how much Herbie whined during the broadcast, the plays were reviewed and the right calls were made.

Exactly. They weren't bad calls that they failed to overturn. The calls were made by the officiating crew after review, who all agreed there was sufficient video evidence for the call. Additionally the rules expert on the broadcast made the exact same determination while watching the replays even before the officiating crew did.

 

[58straight]

The targeting call was spot on for sure he speared lawrence right in the head, the other non fumble call was 50/50 its still *** ohio st till the grave regardless

 

[Silverball]

The targeting call was spot on for sure he speared lawrence right in the head, the other non fumble call was 50/50 its still *** ohio st till the grave regardless

The targeting probably was legit under the rulebook, but the rulebook is really lame. And, honestly, I don’t think officials should be enforcing lame assed targeting calls to a T.

Clemson’s “incomplete pass” was clearly a fumble.

 

[OptimusCreampie]

They got the next 20 years to complain lol f them

 

[TemplarCane]

It's funny....... but we been complaining for 17 years and counting...... ****em

We’re still complaining about the Cleveland Gary phantom fumble/turnover on downs call at ND in 1988.

But ***** OSU.

 

[58straight]

The targeting probably was legit under the rulebook, but the rulebook is really lame. And, honestly, I don’t think officials should be enforcing lame assed targeting calls to a T.

Clemson’s “incomplete pass” was clearly a fumble.

If you dont call a blatant crown of the helmet spear to the head of a qb in the pocket thats not a runner you never will, it was a clear and obvious dirty play, im sure they did it on purpose to try and knock out clemsons best player just like they purposely targeted Willis mcgahees knees to take him out the fiesta in 03