- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 2,237
Looked at the success of the top 10 recruits, from California, in each of a recent 3 year period. It is something I'd been wondering about with state of Florida recruits as well. How well do recruits actually produce, particularly where they initially sign?
Here is the link: https://theathletic.com/4688598/202...rformance/?source=weeklyemail&campaign=602288
Takeaways
• Of the 30 players from the 2019 through 2021 classes on this list — who have each been in college for at least two years — 13 have started for multiple seasons at the school they initially signed with. Worthy signed with Michiganbut didn’t enroll and signed with Texas. It would be 14 if you want to count him.
• USC signed 11 players on this list. Oregon was next with six, followed by Georgia with four.
• Georgia has been selective in Southern California, and the players the Bulldogs have signed have filled some crucial roles.
• USC had a development issue under Clay Helton that has hurt the perception of the program. Lincoln Riley is tasked with fixing that.
• Fifteen of the 40 players listed have transferred at least once.
Here is the link: https://theathletic.com/4688598/202...rformance/?source=weeklyemail&campaign=602288
Takeaways
• Of the 30 players from the 2019 through 2021 classes on this list — who have each been in college for at least two years — 13 have started for multiple seasons at the school they initially signed with. Worthy signed with Michiganbut didn’t enroll and signed with Texas. It would be 14 if you want to count him.
• USC signed 11 players on this list. Oregon was next with six, followed by Georgia with four.
• Georgia has been selective in Southern California, and the players the Bulldogs have signed have filled some crucial roles.
• USC had a development issue under Clay Helton that has hurt the perception of the program. Lincoln Riley is tasked with fixing that.
• Fifteen of the 40 players listed have transferred at least once.