forums

House v NCAA

NJshoreCane

NJshoreCane

Go Bust Someone Else’s Balls
Premium
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
6,928
The student-athlete compensation model is set to change after Judge Claudia Wilken granted preliminary approval of the settlement in the House v. NCAA case. She is scheduled to hold her final approval hearing on April 7, 2025. If she approves the settlement, Power 4 schools will have the opportunity to share revenue with student-athletes starting with the 2025-26 school year. The cap for that student-athlete allocation is expected to fall between $20-22 million dollars per year.

In addition, going forward scholarship limitations are being replaced with roster limits for each sport, which will drastically change the scholarship structure...

Question for those who know a helluva lot more than I do:
Is the shared revenue in addition to NIL/Canes Connection?
 

Advertisement
NJshoreCane said:
The student-athlete compensation model is set to change after Judge Claudia Wilken granted preliminary approval of the settlement in the House v. NCAA case. She is scheduled to hold her final approval hearing on April 7, 2025. If she approves the settlement, Power 4 schools will have the opportunity to share revenue with student-athletes starting with the 2025-26 school year. The cap for that student-athlete allocation is expected to fall between $20-22 million dollars per year.

In addition, going forward scholarship limitations are being replaced with roster limits for each sport, which will drastically change the scholarship structure...

Question for those who know a helluva lot more than I do:
Is the shared revenue in addition to NIL/Canes Connection?
Click to expand...

I could be wrong but as of right now the players can only collect NIL deals that are not affiliated with the school.

My interpretation of this is if it passes, the school will be able to share the revenue that they make from sports with their athletes.

So yes, to answer your question I believe the shared revenue would be coming directly from the school. All the NIL deals will still be coming from outside organizations.
 
Last edited:
I'm against regulation and pro free market. If smaller schools can't keep up then good. I didn't want them anyway.
 
This is separate.

The schools will be on the hook for around 20 million, that they have to pay to student athletes.

Its going to create chaos. The school that can pay the most to football and basketball players will be at an advantage. The only way to guarantee to do that is to get rid of as many sports as possible. Sports that don't generate revenue are on the chopping block.

If Title IX requires schools to pay female athletes the same as football players, the number of women's sports are going to be cut down to the bare minimum.

Buckle up.
 
Is this an SEC work around where they can pay and then a little extra under the table? Or is NIL still in the picture
 
Advertisement
SCarolina Ibis said:
This is separate.

The schools will be on the hook for around 20 million, that they have to pay to student athletes.

Its going to create chaos. The school that can pay the most to football and basketball players will be at an advantage. The only way to guarantee to do that is to get rid of as many sports as possible. Sports that don't generate revenue are on the chopping block.

If Title IX requires schools to pay female athletes the same as football players, the number of women's sports are going to be cut down to the bare minimum.

Buckle up.
Click to expand...
The law of unintended consequences always prevails
 
SCarolina Ibis said:
This is separate.

The schools will be on the hook for around 20 million, that they have to pay to student athletes.

Its going to create chaos. The school that can pay the most to football and basketball players will be at an advantage. The only way to guarantee to do that is to get rid of as many sports as possible. Sports that don't generate revenue are on the chopping block.

If Title IX requires schools to pay female athletes the same as football players, the number of women's sports are going to be cut down to the bare minimum.

Buckle up.
Click to expand...

What is different from today? Schools with strong NIL collectives/donors are at advantage well unless you hire Mike Norvell.

Most schools won’t get rid of sports but I can see them cutting the number of scholarships and overall budgets. Honestly it is needed, field hockey or equestrian or rowing athletes shouldn’t be on full scholarships and shouldn’t be flying all over the country for events. A lot of sports need to be bumped to the club level.

It is not the responsibility of Football and Basketball players to pay for other sports.

Title IX is going to lead to lawsuits but at the end of the day I don’t see this Supreme Court agreeing that female athletes deserve the same amount of revenue sharing with football/basketball players. Judge Kavanaugh in particular seems to want to dissect it.
 
Advertisement
The rest of that paragraph from Rad was hinting of the collection basket being sent out more frequently.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top