In layman’s terms (hypothetical)
Rank PTS Team Rating Stars
#1 50 MIA .99 5
#2 38 CLE .98 5
#3 35 CLE .98 5
#4 32 MIA .96 4
#5 31 MIA .95 4
#6 18 CLE .93 4
#7 5 CLE .90 4
#8 4 CLE .90 4
#9 3 MIA .88 3
#10 2 MIA .84 3
Miami 118 pts .922 Avg
Clemson 110 pts .938 Avg
Just made this up quick to illustrate that points awarded to top players is exponential and not the same as average commit ranking. It is made up to illustrate the point.
It’s all just stats. You can make them say whatever you want. I personally like this system because it doesn’t punish a team for having one or two guys committed at the bottom of the ranking system. Sometimes these guys just haven’t been evaluated. This system places a higher value on top end players and less on the difference between low 4 stars and 3 stars.