forums

Feinbum should be banned from TV

dycane

dycane

Senior
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
6,736
Is there any bigger example of ESPN's SEC agenda than putting that troll Feinbum on prime time? The guy just suggested that a one loss SEC team should go to the NCG over FSU, OSU, or any other school from any other conference.
 
Advertisement
FSU and OSU have played nobody at all.

If either Mizzou or Auburn wins comfortably on Saturday nobody in the country will have a better resume than them. NOBODY.

And if FSU and OSU have a problem with that they should have scheduled somebody other than the FAMUs and Idaho's out of conference.

People call it SEC homerism, but Auburn/Mizzou will have at least 4 better wins on their resume than FSU/OSU will have. Nothing homerish about that, it's just the facts.
 
Yup, I agree that OSU should be on the outside looking in. If they had played more than one ranked team all year long they could have a claim.
 
Advertisement
If I had a ballot, I would probably put FSU #1, but I would have Bama #2, Auburn #3 and Mizzou #4.

No doubt in my mind Alabama would beat Auburn 9 out of 10 times on a neutral field. As it was, Bama dominated most aspects of that game and lost on a series of flukey plays.

People get too caught up in the timing of wins and losses and sometimes give 1 loss too much weight. Bama, per the eyeball test, is one of the 2 best teams in the country but won't get to play for the title because they got all the wrong bounces in their last game.

/That said, **** Nick Saban and Alabama....just a shame that FSU is probably gonna roll to their 3rd against Ohio State
 
Cane33 what quality wins do they have? Cause some people think the sec is godly so if they beat one another they have quality wins. You think Auburns win over Bama was quality? I call it luck, kicker missed 3 and one blocked include that crazy run back at the end. FSU kicking the **** out of teams on their schedule that's quality and shows how good your team is.
 
First of all Auburn ran for like 300 yards down Bamar's throat, and asked them how they liked it.

Bamar didn't dominate.

Second of all, auburn has beaten 1 top 15 team. Texas A&M and LSU arent as good this year, but people overrate them in their mind.


Third don't give me that about beating more quality teams should get you in the title game when a few years ago Oklahoma State had 5 wins to 2 wins for Bamar over top 25 teams, but Banar got the nod.

Sec fans can cry a river from the couch watching Free shoes roll the the luck eyes as far as I'm concerned
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
cane33 said:
FSU and OSU have played nobody at all.

If either Mizzou or Auburn wins comfortably on Saturday nobody in the country will have a better resume than them. NOBODY.

And if FSU and OSU have a problem with that they should have scheduled somebody other than the FAMUs and Idaho's out of conference.

People call it SEC homerism, but Auburn/Mizzou will have at least 4 better wins on their resume than FSU/OSU will have. Nothing homerish about that, it's just the facts.
Click to expand...

So it's FSU's fault that UF had an unexpected down year? They beat two teams in the Top 7 along with two other ranked teams.. Just bc the polls decide to rank teams like Ole Miss doesn't make the win anymore credible than FSU beating Maryland.

Who exactly has Mizzou beaten? Toledo, Indiana, Arkansas St, Vandy, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ole Miss & Texas A&M.. That's one solid win over A&M (at home) & the only other good team they played (South Carolina) beat them at their place. SO IMPRESSIVE... said nobody ever.
 
Some of you guys watch waaaay too much of ESPN's original programming. If I'm not watching a game they're broadcasting I stay away from that network as much as possible.
 
Advertisement
Finebaum was brought to ESPN to suck Bama and the SEC's nuts in public. If you haven't figured out ESPN's agenda, then that's on you. Mr. Burns is a talking head brought in to validate Reece, Jesse, Scott "Scrambled Eggs Head" Pollard, and that ***** Dari's opinions. He's a freaking cartoon:

22.gif
 
If it keeps FSU and/or Ohio State out of the title game then I am all for it. I welcome our SEC overlords.
 
Advertisement
cowboycane said:
If I had a ballot, I would probably put FSU #1, but I would have Bama #2, Auburn #3 and Mizzou #4.

No doubt in my mind Alabama would beat Auburn 9 out of 10 times on a neutral field. As it was, Bama dominated most aspects of that game and lost on a series of flukey plays.

People get too caught up in the timing of wins and losses and sometimes give 1 loss too much weight. Bama, per the eyeball test, is one of the 2 best teams in the country but won't get to play for the title because they got all the wrong bounces in their last game.

/That said, **** Nick Saban and Alabama....just a shame that FSU is probably gonna roll to their 3rd against Ohio State
Click to expand...

The difference here is that Alabama lost at a time they absolutely could not lose. It's an inner-conference game and they may be the better team 364 days out of the year but the 1 day they weren't, they happened to lose. So no SEC championship game for them. I could careless really but it's kind of hard to get caught up in the timing of wins and losses when they don't even get to play in their conference championship game. Makes it kind of hard to put them in front of the team that just beat them. Luck or not.
 
cane33 said:
FSU and OSU have played nobody at all.

If either Mizzou or Auburn wins comfortably on Saturday nobody in the country will have a better resume than them. NOBODY.

And if FSU and OSU have a problem with that they should have scheduled somebody other than the FAMUs and Idaho's out of conference.

People call it SEC homerism, but Auburn/Mizzou will have at least 4 better wins on their resume than FSU/OSU will have. Nothing homerish about that, it's just the facts.
Click to expand...

Dont lose to a ****** LSU team and you have nothing to complain about.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top