Okay, I've been thinking this for some time, but...I say BUT I have no real basis for this comparison. It popped in my head at some point and I can't get it out. It must be because both were highly regarded in high school, and while I don't really remember clearly, I seem to think this guy was another 'second coming' type with tons of hype. Plus I believe their frame/size is comparable....anyways...
Lorenzo Booker.
I think I'm just looking for someone to tell me the comparison is way off and no way could Duke ever become so ineffective in college as compared to high school.
Is the comparison off?
I'm conference Duke, while shifty and explosive, may be toonundersized.
But again, I don't truly know much about either guy in h.s., and don't really know what I'm talking about.