So who gets more with less here? Some proof making good evaluations and getting players good for your system is important as stars.There's Clemson, Alabama, Ohio State and everyone else
But we as talented as Clemson they say
Of those three? Probably Clemson. They’ve only been recruiting at an extreme level for a few years. Bama and OSU have been racking up 5 stars for a while now.So who gets more with less here? Some proof making good evaluations and getting players good for your system is important as stars.
Only the people who really hate the coaches.Literally no one says that.
Some people thought the game would be close....I said 43-17 Clemson one point off and it was because of talentLiterally no one says that.
Correct and did it with good evaluations along with players that fit to build their team. We need that type recruiting again. Been a whileOf those three? Probably Clemson. They’ve only been recruiting at an extreme level for a few years. Bama and OSU have been racking up 5 stars for a while now.
Yea cause butch Davis would find those 1 star gems and turn em into future HOF players... says CIS Butch slurpersStars........we don’t need no stinking stars.
In today's recruitingYea cause butch Davis would find those 1 star gems and turn em into future HOF players... says CIS Butch slurpers