Ah3

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
How about that, AH had a couple of guys sign early. So there's that nugget.


can't be the three were discussing since they all took OVs

No. It's the misconception that Heritage didn't allow any of their kids to sign early. Surtain Sr. just said that he had a couple of guys that signed early. Never said it had anything to do with the blue chippers, just this false narrative that they don't allow their kids to sign early.
 
Advertisement
How about that, AH had a couple of guys sign early. So there's that nugget.


can't be the three were discussing since they all took OVs

No. It's the misconception that Heritage didn't allow any of their kids to sign early. Surtain Sr. just said that he had a couple of guys that signed early. Never said it had anything to do with the blue chippers, just this false narrative that they don't allow their kids to sign early.

Hm and who pedaled that false narrative?
 
Advertisement
How about that, AH had a couple of guys sign early. So there's that nugget.


can't be the three were discussing since they all took OVs

No. It's the misconception that Heritage didn't allow any of their kids to sign early. Surtain Sr. just said that he had a couple of guys that signed early. Never said it had anything to do with the blue chippers, just this false narrative that they don't allow their kids to sign early.

Hm and who pedaled that false narrative?

When questioned why Nesta didn't sign early, people were saying that Heritage didn't want their kids to sign early.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top