So if we win out we get another shot at fsu?
Correct. However we need to self-impose if we think the NCAA is going to give us a 2 year post season ban
Edit: we can actually lose to Virginia, beat Duke and still win it. Or beat Virginia, lose to Duke and make it if Duke losses to Clemson and GT
So if we win out we get another shot at fsu?
If we beat UVA and Duke we get another shot... as long as we dont self ban.
Unless the notice of allegations is terribly bloody, we shouldn't self ban again. There's no guarantee it would do anything. Plus, weigh the positives for the program of going to the championship game and the extra practices for a very young team. I think we'd be idiots to self impose again.
And yes, most likely FSU, but possibly Clemson if VT can manage an upset at home a week from now. That is, of course, if we beat Virginia and Duke.
Why do you think we're going to lose to Virginia? LOL they're the worst.
Correct. However we need to self-impose if we think the NCAA is going to give us a 2 year post season ban
Edit: we can actually lose to Virginia, beat Duke and still win it. Or beat Virginia, lose to Duke and make it if Duke losses to Clemson and GT
we aint gettin a 3 year bowl ban. no ******* way. i dont see how you can self impose en route to an ACC champ game. not gonna happen
If we self-ban, it will help with younger recruits who will feel more comfortable coming to a team that will certainly be playing in post season games going forward.
It's a **** of a statement to qualify for the ACC Championship and self-ban. It's putting everything potentially bad behind us we possibly can while the future is getting much brighter.
If we self-ban, it will help with younger recruits who will feel more comfortable coming to a team that will certainly be playing in post season games going forward.
It's a **** of a statement to qualify for the ACC Championship and self-ban. It's putting everything potentially bad behind us we possibly can while the future is getting much brighter.
no team should put the interest of future players over current ones
what about players like Mike James and Davon Johnson and Brandon McGee who busted their behinds? or even the freshmen who were fed to the wolves?
it's a total ***** move if we impose a ACCCG ban.
If we self-ban, it will help with younger recruits who will feel more comfortable coming to a team that will certainly be playing in post season games going forward.
It's a **** of a statement to qualify for the ACC Championship and self-ban. It's putting everything potentially bad behind us we possibly can while the future is getting much brighter.
I think we play the ACCCG but skip the following bowl game that were invited to after
If we self-ban, it will help with younger recruits who will feel more comfortable coming to a team that will certainly be playing in post season games going forward.
It's a **** of a statement to qualify for the ACC Championship and self-ban. It's putting everything potentially bad behind us we possibly can while the future is getting much brighter.
no team should put the interest of future players over current ones
what about players like Mike James and Davon Johnson and Brandon McGee who busted their behinds? or even the freshmen who were fed to the wolves?
it's a total ***** move if we impose a ACCCG ban.
I think we play the ACCCG but skip the following bowl game that were invited to after
This!
If it's self imposed, it can be whatever we want it to be. Post season ban is not the same as a bowl ban.
It might it hurt us, but I'd see a self imposed bowl ban after participating in the ACCCG as the same thing as us taking 1.5 bowl bans.