2013 WR I like a lot

Advertisement
looks like a slower, less shifty version of Kermit. He's a slot guy that doesnt really compare to Cunningham in my opinion
 
PUNCICANE said:
looks like a slower, less shifty version of Kermit. He's a slot guy that doesnt really compare to Cunningham in my opinion

He's a lot bigger than Kermit and I think he could play on the outside. Jmo
 
Advertisement
I'll take Clark. We need speed and this guy has it. He's also an extremely intelligent, good kid like Cunningham.
 
There are probably 18 'Clark types' in florida. IMO, there are only about 4 - 5 Cunningham types. Give me Cunningham.
 
There are probably 18 'Clark types' in florida. IMO, there are only about 4 - 5 Cunningham types. Give me Cunningham.

What do you think separates Cunningham? I'm just curious what you see because I'm having trouble seeing what he brings differently to the current WR group.
 
Advertisement
If we dont land cunningham i wouldnt mind taking this guy. How tall is cunningham cause i have seen him listed at 6'2 or 6'3 but everybody says he is smaller than that?
 
If we dont land cunningham i wouldnt mind taking this guy. How tall is cunningham cause i have seen him listed at 6'2 or 6'3 but everybody says he is smaller than that?

He is honestly closer to 6'0 and that's what a lot of ppl don't realize. It would be a different situation if he was a legit 6'3, but he's not
 
If we dont land cunningham i wouldnt mind taking this guy. How tall is cunningham cause i have seen him listed at 6'2 or 6'3 but everybody says he is smaller than that?

He is honestly closer to 6'0 and that's what a lot of ppl don't realize. It would be a different situation if he was a legit 6'3, but he's not

i wouldnt mind taking a shot on this kid. does the staff have any interest in this kid?
 
Advertisement
If we dont land cunningham i wouldnt mind taking this guy. How tall is cunningham cause i have seen him listed at 6'2 or 6'3 but everybody says he is smaller than that?

He is honestly closer to 6'0 and that's what a lot of ppl don't realize. It would be a different situation if he was a legit 6'3, but he's not

i wouldnt mind taking a shot on this kid. does the staff have any interest in this kid?

I'm looking into it, but we were on him earlier for sure
 
I guess it all comes down to what you look for in a WR when you evaluate them. We all have our own opinions, I'm a big fan of Bill Walsh and West Coast offenses, so I kind of like receivers that fit in to that system.

Ideal size: say around 6-3, 210

Agility and body control are #1 priority in my mind... the ability to change your body position, sometimes mid-air, in order to get your hands in position to make the catch. I don't really see that in these highlights, he's mainly catching the ball in space. Then again, that doesn't mean he doesn't have this talent.... it's just not showcased on the highlights.

Next on my WR wishlist is strength. That's why I like them at like 210 or so. You need to power through players. When you are bounced into players you must be able to keep your feet, regain your balance and move into position and continue your pass route. Just watch Jerry Rice clips to see what I'm talking about.

Hands are vital, they have to have outstanding hands. You have to assume the staff wouldn't be dumb enough to recruit someone who can't catch the ball. The difference between players is the agility and strength that was mentioned. That allows them to get into position to make the catch, to use their hands.

In reality, most catches are made with the ball and the defender closing at the same instant and the receiver having to reverse his body into a totally different position, get your hands up and catch the ball and be hit at the same moment. That is the key element in greatness -- agility and strength together.

What about speed?

Well burst and quickness are helpful. Long speed is not that important. You would like a receiver with the ball in the open field to be able to keep the separation with the closing defenders until he gets over the goal line. He doesn't have to outrun them. He doesn't have to gain ground on them. He just has to get there before they do so he scores. So it doesn't have to be sprinters' speed, a la Kermit Whitfield. Just get to top speed quickly, so you don't get caught from behind.

Since you have to be pretty slow to get caught from behind, 40 time isn't that critical in my mind. They just need to have a burst.

The other thing I think is important is durability. Again, that's why a bigger guy is better in my book.
 
Are we still recruiting this guy Peter? Not too many faster at wr in the country than this kid.
 
Advertisement
I'll take any kid that can get open and actually catch the **** ball. A WR that can make not only the routine plays but the "help out the QB" plays as well.

We haven't had a guy like that in a long long time.
 
We don't need any WR's other than AJL unless they're a top of the line talent IMO. We're loaded at WR once AJL gets here.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top