2011 Defense Ramblings (long)

RiDLer80

All-American
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
20,296
The last couple of days I've been going back to the 2011 season and watching some of the games on Flash Forward (shout out to lestat) with a focus on our defense. Now, that defense wasn't the most talented, and the numbers show that, but at least it was aggressive-ish.

Now, the "success" of that defense overall may have been helped by the pace of the offense. That season the offense didn't play at the breakneck speed that we've seen the past two seasons and the numbers reflect that.

Total defense rank was 45 allowing 359.92 ypg. Scoring defense was 17 at 20.08 ppg. The team also ranked 48th in country in tackles per loss per game at 6.08 tfl pg.

Now for some rambling:

Sean Spence is really missed. He was so instinctual out there. He could diagnose a play like no player we've had in some time. He could blow up a WR tunnel screen better than anybody I've ever seen. It's a **** shame he played on such ****** teams.

The DL- DTs-Darius Smith, Micanor Regis, Marcus Forston, Ojomo; DEs-Andrew Smith, Chickillo, Marcus Robinson, Vernon (after a long suspension)

That wasn't the most talented DL and it got gashed a lot, but at least we were taking the action to the opposing teams. We weren't getting blown into our LBs laps, but we were still getting gashed. But at least when we were getting worked, we were doing it aggressively. And because of that occasionally we were able to disrupt the timing of an offense in the backfield!

Later in the season I noticed Dorito tried to implement some of his stuff. I remember watching a particular play where he had Vernon stand up at OLB, similar to Green this season, and you could tell he was thinking instead of playing when asked to control the OL. Because of thinking instead of playing Vernon got blown 3-4 yards back. And I know Vernon isn't some weak scrub like we've seen come through here the last 2 years. I remember him as a freshman working Wisconsin OL Gabe Carimi in the Champs Sports Bowl.

Honestly, there were times where Dorito had the right call made and our players just failed to make a play. Players were in good position but just couldn't make the play.

Sometimes we had a player bottled up, but players didn't rally to the ball fast enough and a play was made where it maybe shouldn't have.

Slanting. That team was terrible at slanting. It seemed like a majority of the time we slanted we got gashed. Sometimes is a player getting washed out and sometimes it was a player failing to cover his proper gap.

There were some mind-numbing things that we're used to today. I remember a particular 3rd and 6 in the VT game I believe where he had our corners bail at the snap and Thomas threw for an easy slant and conversion.

Another familiar sight was our base defense in against 3 and even 4 wide sets. I still don't understand this rationale.

Stunting. That team was a terrible stunting team. The couple games I watched the stunts never seemed to work.

Speaking of stunting, some of them were obviously coming looking at our alignment. I'm talking about Forston lined up at end shaded to the inside of the tackle with a DE like Vernon lined up at DT. Every time we aligned with a DT at DE and DE at DT, we ran a stunt. C'mon man!

Another thing I noticed a lot was a 3 man rush that included two tackles and a DE like Chick. Zero pressure. And this came on obvious passing downs like 2nd and 14.

We played a lot of soft coverage that year, but I can't really blame him when our corners were Brandon McGee, Lee Chambers (a converted RB) and Mike Williams (a Wake Forest transfer).

Our safeties weren't much better with JoJo Nicolas, Vaughn Telemaque and AJ Highsmith (Ray Ray was suspended most of that season).

The LBs were our "best" group with Spence, Gaines, DP and Futch.

That defense played better than any other defense we've had under this regime. Maybe it's due to the scheme allowing the front four to be more aggressive, maybe it's because that's the most talent the defensive front has had under Golden. Most likely it's a combination of both.

All I know is that defense forced the action up front and offenses sometimes got behind the chains because of it. It seems like these last two years opposing offenses are always on schedule. Now, in 2011 teams usually converted against us because our secondary was trash and our LBs couldn't cover. The usual issues were there-flats uncovered, TEs dragging wide open.

One more thing. That flip the switch thing the defense does when the opposing offense gets in the redzone is as *** as AIDS. Why not play with that intensity the entire drive?

Anyway, I'm done. If you want to do your own film breakdown please do and add your thoughts. With the way things are unfolding with our DT recruiting, we may be going back to a defense similar to our 2011 defense.

2011 Flash Forward video link: http://www.youtube.com/user/CanesFlashForward/search?query=2011
 
Advertisement
all we need is some big d tackles to plug the middle and stop the run, our secondary is pretty good right now only weakness is those crossing routes they have to find some who can cover whichever receiver is crossing the middle if we can do that we can be good
 
The crazy thing about that defense, is at the time that defense seemed sooo bad... But comparing it after the last two we have seen it just seems so much better. Mike Williams walked on in the summer and in a couple weeks grabbed a starting spot at the University of Miami. This is a player who lost his position at Wake to true freshman. My Gawd. Atleast Db recruiting has gotten better I never have to see that again, I can watch top talent bail on 3rd and short.
 
Advertisement
The crazy thing about that defense, is at the time that defense seemed sooo bad... But comparing it after the last two we have seen it just seems so much better. Mike Williams walked on in the summer and in a couple weeks grabbed a starting spot at the University of Miami. This is a player who lost his position at Wake to true freshman. My Gawd. Atleast Db recruiting has gotten better I never have to see that again, I can watch top talent bail on 3rd and short.
That's the thing, it was sooo bad. While it was 17th in scoring it was like 47th in yards. Which at the time made it the worst defense since the late 90's.
 
What goes unnoticed is that the 2011 defense with all its holes and suspensions(vernon 6 games, Ray Ray 4) and early season injuries to guys like Forston, Buchanon, had a better rush defense than the 2010 defense that was relatively healthy and had NFL guys like Bailey and McCarthy, and Brandon Harris.
 
What goes unnoticed is that the 2011 defense with all its holes and suspensions(vernon 6 games, Ray Ray 4) and early season injuries to guys like Forston, Buchanon, had a better rush defense than the 2010 defense that was relatively healthy and had NFL guys like Bailey and McCarthy, and Brandon Harris.
Yea, by 100 yards playing in 1 less game than 2010 (no bowl game). And gave up 600 yards more passing.
 
Last edited:
The crazy thing about that defense, is at the time that defense seemed sooo bad... But comparing it after the last two we have seen it just seems so much better. Mike Williams walked on in the summer and in a couple weeks grabbed a starting spot at the University of Miami. This is a player who lost his position at Wake to true freshman. My Gawd. Atleast Db recruiting has gotten better I never have to see that again, I can watch top talent bail on 3rd and short.

Agreed. Unfortunately the pussification of the defense started in the Maryland game. throughout the year a healthy dose of soft zone coverage, DBs playing 12 yards off the bowl. Don't get fooled by the press coverage, cause our DBs be bailing right off the snap in a cover 3. Who are we trying to fool with all this press bail coverage??
 
Advertisement
Would love to go back to that defense but don't believe coach D will do it. If he wants to save his job he better do something.
 
The crazy thing about that defense, is at the time that defense seemed sooo bad... But comparing it after the last two we have seen it just seems so much better. Mike Williams walked on in the summer and in a couple weeks grabbed a starting spot at the University of Miami. This is a player who lost his position at Wake to true freshman. My Gawd. Atleast Db recruiting has gotten better I never have to see that again, I can watch top talent bail on 3rd and short.
That's the thing, it was sooo bad. While it was 17th in scoring it was like 47th in yards. Which at the time made it the worst defense since the late 90's.

I would be ecstatic to see those kind of defensive numbers right now.
 
crossover22[]_[];1812190 said:
Would love to go back to that defense but don't believe coach D will do it. If he wants to save his job he better do something.

My question is why did they choose to run that defense? They had plenty of time to install their own defense. They were there by the bowl game and could have began installation in the spring. Maybe the felt they just didn't have the personnel to run their 3-4. There were really no hybrid types on that defense other than Marcus Robinson and a stretch in Vernon.

Our DTs absolutely were not built for the 3-4. I'm hoping that's the case this year also. We don't have a single player on our roster who'd make a good nose in a 3-4. We try lining anybody up over the center and controlling the A-gaps and he's getting blown into our safeties.
 
Advertisement
This is going to be our best defense this year. We have studs now and not fillers. That group that year besides Spence and vernon were fillers.I remember mike Williams and absolutely hated to see him play. Futch was overrated. Spence was essentially like Perryman last year. The only making tackles. Sigh....I just want our defense back.
 
crossover22[]_[];1812190 said:
Would love to go back to that defense but don't believe coach D will do it. If he wants to save his job he better do something.

My question is why did they choose to run that defense? They had plenty of time to install their own defense. They were there by the bowl game and could have began installation in the spring. Maybe the felt they just didn't have the personnel to run their 3-4. There were really no hybrid types on that defense other than Marcus Robinson and a stretch in Vernon.

Our DTs absolutely were not built for the 3-4. I'm hoping that's the case this year also. We don't have a single player on our roster who'd make a good nose in a 3-4. We try lining anybody up over the center and controlling the A-gaps and he's getting blown into our safeties.

your coach is stubborn. he wants his **** to work.
 
This is going to be our best defense this year. We have studs now and not fillers. That group that year besides Spence and vernon were fillers.I remember mike Williams and absolutely hated to see him play. Futch was overrated. Spence was essentially like Perryman last year. The only making tackles. Sigh....I just want our defense back.

So here is the question. What happens if this year "stud not fillers" group does not outperform that years group of "fillers"? Will they all of a sudden be a team of fillers and not studs?
 
Advertisement
What goes unnoticed is that the 2011 defense with all its holes and suspensions(vernon 6 games, Ray Ray 4) and early season injuries to guys like Forston, Buchanon, had a better rush defense than the 2010 defense that was relatively healthy and had NFL guys like Bailey and McCarthy, and Brandon Harris.
Yea, by 100 yards playing in 1 less game than 2010 (no bowl game). And gave up 600 yards more passing.

No.. I'm going by rushing yards per game. 2011 was 162 rush yards per game. 2010 was 172.
 
What goes unnoticed is that the 2011 defense with all its holes and suspensions(vernon 6 games, Ray Ray 4) and early season injuries to guys like Forston, Buchanon, had a better rush defense than the 2010 defense that was relatively healthy and had NFL guys like Bailey and McCarthy, and Brandon Harris.
Yea, by 100 yards playing in 1 less game than 2010 (no bowl game). And gave up 600 yards more passing.

No.. I'm going by rushing yards per game. 2011 was 162 rush yards per game. 2010 was 172.
Wow, trending up.
 
What goes unnoticed is that the 2011 defense with all its holes and suspensions(vernon 6 games, Ray Ray 4) and early season injuries to guys like Forston, Buchanon, had a better rush defense than the 2010 defense that was relatively healthy and had NFL guys like Bailey and McCarthy, and Brandon Harris.
Yea, by 100 yards playing in 1 less game than 2010 (no bowl game). And gave up 600 yards more passing.

No.. I'm going by rushing yards per game. 2011 was 162 rush yards per game. 2010 was 172.
Wow, trending up.

I knew it would bother you.
 
crossover22[]_[];1812190 said:
Would love to go back to that defense but don't believe coach D will do it. If he wants to save his job he better do something.

My question is why did they choose to run that defense? They had plenty of time to install their own defense. They were there by the bowl game and could have began installation in the spring. Maybe the felt they just didn't have the personnel to run their 3-4. There were really no hybrid types on that defense other than Marcus Robinson and a stretch in Vernon.

Our DTs absolutely were not built for the 3-4. I'm hoping that's the case this year also. We don't have a single player on our roster who'd make a good nose in a 3-4. We try lining anybody up over the center and controlling the A-gaps and he's getting blown into our safeties.

Preaching to the choir my man.


I don't think they had enough time to do a full install of the 3-4 but I do agree that they saw the personnel that we had a made that choice but at this time they are 2 years into the switch. Are they willing to make a change? That's what will make or break the staff.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top