Actual performance on the field for that 2008 class should change the star avg to a .8
This should be no contest right? wrong! the 2008 recruiting class acording to rivals only had a 3.3 average star rating. the 2013 class has a 3.4 rating. So for all of you star whores 2013>2008!
This should be no contest right? wrong! the 2008 recruiting class acording to rivals only had a 3.3 average star rating. the 2013 class has a 3.4 rating. So for all of you star whores 2013>2008!
You're not a math guy, are you?
Just went by the average stars that rivals had. There was just so many people diassapointed with this years class, I wanted to point out that it was basically the same(star) ranking as our #1 ranked recruiting class of 2008. just with less recruits.This should be no contest right? wrong! the 2008 recruiting class acording to rivals only had a 3.3 average star rating. the 2013 class has a 3.4 rating. So for all of you star whores 2013>2008!
You're not a math guy, are you?