The only thing I've heard, to this end, came from Barry Jackson's column.
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...r-more-reasons-why-um-is-angry-with-ncaa.html
From the article: ### As if the NCAA hasn’t done enough already to aggravate UM, add this to the list: Last week, UM and the NCAA engaged in serious settlement talks, and several UM people expected a deal because president Mark Emmert seemed initially supportive. UM wanted a settlement and likely would have accepted modest scholarship reductions.
But a source said the NCAA then informed UM there would be no deal and suggested to UM the enforcement staff and two key boards were against it because of concerns about “not deviating from the rules.”
So it wasn't two members, but rather two boards that would have needed to approve the settlement. There could have been some further account, though...